<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Tobias Wright</title>
    <link>http://www.tobiaswright.com/blog/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>tobias@tobiaswright.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2011</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2011-12-19T18:58:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Geoffrey Canada on innovation</title>
      <link>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/geoffrey-canada-on-innovation/</link>
      <guid>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/geoffrey-canada-on-innovation/#When:18:58:11Z</guid>
      <description>Geoffrey Canada is the CEO of Harlem Children&#39;s Zone, you might recognize him from the documentary Waiting for Superman. He recently sat down with The New York Times to talk about management, innovation and getting things done within large groups.You have to drive folks to innovate. The tendency in lots of large organizations is to try and find a comfortable place where you think you can get measured rewards for measured work. In other words, they say to themselves, “I know how much I’m going to get if I do this much, and then my life is in balance.” I just don’t think you get a lot of innovation under those circumstances. You want people to figure out how to do things better, to figure out a smarter way. When that’s a constant process, you start seeing things innovate. It’s not because someone comes up with some brand&#45;new idea where you say, “Oh, no one’s ever thought about this before.”

Check out the whole article on Geoffrey Canada.</description>
      <dc:subject>Business, Creativity, Productivity</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-12-19T18:58:11+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>To Long; Dont Read: The tl;dr statement</title>
      <link>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/to-long-dont-read-the-tldr-statement/</link>
      <guid>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/to-long-dont-read-the-tldr-statement/#When:21:27:33Z</guid>
      <description>I would hazard to guess that no one is going to read this. Not this post, not this website or anything about me. Why? Because it’s too long, there’s too much, and who can invest in something that they may or may not be interesting or helpful.
I’m actually okay with this, because really this site has one purpose, I want a visitor to know: Who I am and what I do. Everything else on the site is just in support of that.

That got me to thinking: Should more sites be designed around a tl;dr statement?

The term tl;dr means “Too long; don’t read”, you’ll find it in use in some popular forums such as Hacker News and Reddit and is usually followed by a short synopsis of a more lengthy comment that adds color and nuisance, but really the tl;dr says it all.

When thinking about your site, could it be summed up in a short thesis sentence? Will digging deeper only reinforce the thesis? If so why not help your visitors?</description>
      <dc:subject>Branding, Featured</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-10-17T21:27:33+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>My Top Ten SEO tips</title>
      <link>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/top-ten-seo-tips/</link>
      <guid>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/top-ten-seo-tips/#When:19:46:08Z</guid>
      <description>I had the good fortune to take the two day workshop for SEO. It was a very good experience,and there is plenty that can help others. Here is my Top Ten takeaways from the workshop that can help everyone 10. Google is really the only search engine that matters. They carefully control their search market share here in the US to under 66% so they won&#8217;t get charged with running a monopoly. In other parts of the world they have 90% market share

 9. Check what is the norm for you industry. Generally a well optimized web page falls in what is considered normal for like pages. For example, a shopping page might only have 250 words of copy, this is considered &#8216;natural&#8217;. Google does try to consider that when determining Search Engine results, so if you are doing something different, while you may not penalized, it may not help.

8. #1, #2 and #3 are the only positions that matter in a SERP (Search Engine Results Page). Google is increasingly adding value to searches by adding maps, images and videos in SERPs, a great thing for the user, but it does take a little more effort for the site that wants to get above the fold. Position 20 might as well be position 10,000.

7. Search results is a games of inches. With millions of results per query, the distance between position 3 and position 2 and position 1 is the width of a hair. It&#8217;s about which page is &#8216;least imperfect&#8217;. Put another way SERPs is a game of inches.

6. Focus on the long&#45;tail. When people search they generally try to be specific as possible generally using 3&#45;4 words. If those terms don&#8217;t produce the desired results, then the user start searching more broadly

5. Use the tilde &#8216;~&#8217; when doing keyword research. The tilde is an undocumented way when doing a google search to also return up a result that not only produce your results but also other terms that users have used when searching for the same thing, this is great for long&#45;tail keyword research. An example search term might be &#8220;~fashion&#8221;, which also brings up &#8216;style&#8217;, &#8216;accessories&#8217;, &#8216;clothing&#8217; and a slew of fashion related terms

4. Structure you site into silos. If structure is properly done, you can maximize pagerank for internal links. So, that means fewer links per page, linking to landing pages, and being a lot more thoughtful on how you link to other areas of the site and whether you should.

3. Use Google endorsed schema&#8217;s. Sitemaps XML files are something we already know about, but a new thing google has endorsed is schemas. This s a spec they intend to probably support in 2012, but it&#8217;s a headache to implement, so weight the cost benefit of implementation

2. Result may vary, Factors in SERP can be influence by location and the searches that can before it. For example, if you initially search pushups you&#8217;d probably get a lot of results about exercise, but if the search before that one was on bras, you&#8217;d get a different set of results. In regards to location, they are starting to be more and more important in result rankings. Think about those things when writing for your sites.

1. Content is still king. We all know this, but the definition is expanding to video (with transcribing), PDFs and images, (which google is starting to learn to read), and of course social media</description>
      <dc:subject>Business, Featured, Strategy</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-10-14T19:46:08+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Afterwit.com, a blog about speaking</title>
      <link>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/afterwit.com-a-blog-about-speaking/</link>
      <guid>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/afterwit.com-a-blog-about-speaking/#When:20:56:04Z</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve had an additional blog to help people become better speakers called Afterwit.com. This is dedicated to all things that go into making a better speaker. As a very active Toastmaster and something I&#39;m passionate about, I&#39;m always on the lookout for good resources. I&#39;ve just recently posting there again. Check it out.</description>
      <dc:subject>Projects</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-10-06T20:56:04+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>FourSquare Hackathon project: Everything is cool</title>
      <link>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/foursquare-hackathon-project-everything-is-cool/</link>
      <guid>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/foursquare-hackathon-project-everything-is-cool/#When:11:39:53Z</guid>
      <description>I participated in the foursquare hackathon over the weekend. My project is called Everything is cool. The idea behind my project is that most people when they hear of something going on in your area,, whether it be something weather related, or an accident, all they really want know is where you are and that you are okay.

My app let&#8217;s you do that in the quickest way possible. Using the Foursquare API, once you sign in it grabs the nearest location to you. From there you can just hit a button, and an email or text will be sent to your contact list with two pieces of information: Where you are and that everything is cool. Here is a link to the demo</description>
      <dc:subject>Business, Featured, Projects, Technology</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-09-23T11:39:53+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>How to Focus</title>
      <link>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/how-to-focus/</link>
      <guid>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/how-to-focus/#When:21:08:13Z</guid>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Design, Productivity</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-09-19T21:08:13+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>What will social media be in five years?</title>
      <link>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/what-will-social-media-be-in-five-years/</link>
      <guid>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/what-will-social-media-be-in-five-years/#When:15:38:09Z</guid>
      <description>I think the term social media will be obsolete. In 5 years all media (and everything else for that matter) will be social and baked into everything that we interact with because everything we interact with will be connected in some form or fashion to a greater network.Social as it is defined now refers to living organisms, i.e. people, but I think that definition is bound to expand to include things as well. What we’ll really mean though is everything will be networked and ‘aware’ of it’s surroundings. I can imagine a world where the alarm clock will be networked to your online calendar and will know when you have a 9am meeting and disable the snooze button.

Additionally, they say that the best time to be on social networks is when you are alone but the gulf of being in two places at once (reality and virtual) will continue to close, on one end technology will be get better and phones (or whatever they will be called) as a distribution and consumption platform will have evolved in to something less intrusive and natural. On the other hand talking with someone face&#45;to&#45;face and doing whatever else will become accepted and even expected by the mainstream.

Will we all still be on Facebook? Google+? Something else? Maybe, whatever is invisible, I don’t want the platform to be awesome, I want to be awesome. People tend to gravitate to what is easy, cheap and gives it to them how they want it, where they want it.

Photo by Peter Peaks</description>
      <dc:subject>Business, Featured, Strategy, Technology</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-09-10T15:38:09+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Learning to fail</title>
      <link>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/learning-to-fail/</link>
      <guid>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/learning-to-fail/#When:20:10:25Z</guid>
      <description>The first thing we noticed was a drop in traffic. Then other symptoms that seemed unrelated at the time were also being reported like search not working. it wasn&#39;t until we got a notice from Google Webmaster that we realized we&#39;d been hacked. Again.
The reality
After taking the site down for the second time in two weeks, it dawned on me, if we are to continue we&#8217;d better learn to fail.

It’s simple, a website with our set &#45;up running a popular content management system on a public facing website might be compromised. It could happen for a variety reasons both in and out of our control. The important thing then is getting the site back to a point where it is safe as soon as possible while being 99% sure that whatever compromised the site in the first place has been removed.</description>
      <dc:subject>Business, Featured, Productivity, Projects, Strategy, Technology</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-06-29T20:10:25+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Social Media Revolution 3</title>
      <link>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/social-media-revolution-3/</link>
      <guid>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/social-media-revolution-3/#When:23:50:43Z</guid>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Branding, Creativity, Strategy, Technology</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-06-26T23:50:43+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Day/Night theme switcher</title>
      <link>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/day-night-theme-switcher/</link>
      <guid>http://www.tobiaswright.com/site/day-night-theme-switcher/#When:02:53:16Z</guid>
      <description>I posted my first project on GitHub. It’s a very simply Day/Night theme switcher built on jQuery based on the client time. This is not a new idea by any stretch of the imagination, something I thought was cooll. I’ve wanted to try GitHub for a while and this seemed like a good first step to try it out.  As for the switcher, I tend to work on projects that are proprietary or not viable as an open source project; I thought this was a good opportunity to finally build this for tobiaswright.com, which I should implement soon. Anyway, enjoy.</description>
      <dc:subject>Code, Projects</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T02:53:16+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
